home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
080993
/
08099916.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
8KB
|
162 lines
<text id=93TT0173>
<title>
Aug. 09, 1993: Rattled Sabers, Redrawn Maps
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
Aug. 09, 1993 Lost Secrets Of The Maya
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BOSNIA, Page 30
Rattled Sabers, Redrawn Maps
</hdr>
<body>
<p>While Bosnia lies dying, politicians in Geneva talk about dismembering
it and Western leaders try again to coordinate their plans for
bombing it
</p>
<p>By BRUCE W. NELAN--With reporting by James L. Graff/Vienna, William Mader/London and
Bruce van Voorst/Washington
</p>
<p> This time it might really happen. The vicious 16-month war
among hate-filled neighbors that has soaked Bosnia and Herzegovina
in blood--and seared the conscience of the rest of the world--might be coming to an end. But not because the combatants
have seen the horror of their ways or the Western democracies
have made justice prevail. If the killing does grind to a stop
in the coming weeks, it will be more out of collective exhaustion
than the result of any agreements or pressures the politicians
are trying to impose.
</p>
<p> The hardest fact, the one that matters most, is that the outnumbered,
outgunned, predominantly Muslim Bosnian government has lost
the war. Rebel Serbs and Croats, with overwhelming support from
their kinsmen in the former republics of Yugoslavia, have together
swallowed 90% of Bosnia's territory. The Serb militia is pounding
on the gates of Sarajevo, and they are about to fly open. If
nothing is done to police the Serb triumph and Muslim defeat,
a final, horrifying bloodbath could sweep over the Bosnian capital
and other Muslim enclaves. That fear spurred negotiators in
Geneva and the Clinton Administration in Washington last week
to try--again--to do something.
</p>
<p> The Bosnian government sat down with its domestic foes and their
godfathers, Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic and Croatian
President Franjo Tudjman, for another round of peace talks.
Everyone felt the mood of deja vu, but this time the Muslims
had to choose between taking what little they might get in a
settlement now, or holding out for more--and losing everything.
Washington debated whether it could use a flash of air power
to warn the Serbs away from Sarajevo without encouraging the
Muslims to balk at signing an agreement. That was as much a
sop to conscience as a calibrated military action, and, as usual,
America and its allies could not agree on how much would be
just right.
</p>
<p> At the session in the huge U.N. palace in Geneva, once the home
of the impotent League of Nations, Bosnian President Alija Izetbegovic
effectively surrendered. He had fought long and hard for the
principle that Bosnia should remain a single, multi ethnic
state. He had held out against U.N. demands that he sign on
to a plan partitioning Bosnia into 10 ethnic provinces. Now,
under heavy pressure from the U.N., and from U.S. special envoy
Reginald Bartholomew, who promised him substantial financial
aid for his new mini-state, he could resist no longer. He accepted
a plan to cut his country apart along ethnic lines. "We have
achieved preliminary agreement," he told his people, "on the
transformation of Bosnia and Herzegovina into a union of three
republics."
</p>
<p> The Serb and Croat leaders could hardly stop smiling at the
confirmation of their triumph. Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic,
a man the U.S. holds responsible for war crimes, emerged from
the Geneva talks to declare portentously, "We should all be
satisfied. No one else need die in Bosnia and Herzegovina."
In fact, that kind of talk is premature, since most of the important
details have yet to be settled. And as Lord Owen, the European
Community's negotiator, noted, "There are all sorts of people
out there who want to continue the war, on all three sides."
</p>
<p> Some of them were still at it despite another Bosnian cease-fire
that took effect Friday night. The hilltops around Sarajevo
went quiet, and the tempo of fighting slowed in most places,
though Muslim units in central Bosnia overran two Croatian towns.
Still, a U.N. spokesman confirmed that "fighting has abated
considerably," quickly adding, "I say that very cautiously."
</p>
<p> Caution is the correct approach. The negotiators in Geneva have
agreed only on constitutional principles--a nation of three
self-governing republics without an effective central parliament.
Only on Saturday did they face the crucial issue--drawing
a final map to divide the territory. "Everything we have achieved,"
said Izetbegovic, "will be worthless if there is no agreement
on the maps."
</p>
<p> Lord Owen and his fellow mediators argue that the Muslim republic
should inherit 30% of Bosnia. Since it controls only 10% today,
that is a big order. Similarly, the Muslims would have to give
up hard-won enclaves in Srebrenica, Zepa and Gorazde. The negotiators
did not agree on the map's details Saturday, but intend to keep
at it this week. If and when they do settle on a formal division,
it will have to be approved by the three parliamentary assemblies.
Everyone remembers how the earlier Vance-Owen plan collapsed
at that stage after weeks of negotiation.
</p>
<p> Even this much agreement among the warring parties was enough
to cool the debate among the U.S., its NATO allies and the U.N.
about using air strikes to protect Sarajevo and other Muslim
"safe havens." They had agreed in May when the enclaves were
announced that NATO planes would be used to protect U.N. peacekeepers
if they came under fire. Since then, French, British and Spanish
blue helmets have been attacked, and the Serbs' pressure on
Muslim areas has tightened. Now Washington was talking up something
broader: air strikes to help protect the Muslims as well as
the peacekeepers.
</p>
<p> If a settlement, or even a solid cease-fire, is in prospect,
military intervention would seem inappropriate. Since the process
is not that far along, allied consultations and war planning
are still under way. Bill Clinton has tried before to get Paris
and London to sign on for strikes against the Serbs, but they
always refused, arguing that bombing would put the blue helmets
in danger. They began to relent after the Serbs got rougher
on the peacekeepers, but backed off again when the U.S. hinted
it had more in mind than simply defending embattled U.N. soldiers.
Senator Joseph Biden, long a hawk on Bosnia, called for air
attacks to lift the siege of Sarajevo, but the Pentagon continued
to oppose anything but the most minimal action. The debate in
Washington, said a senior Defense Department official, "is a
tug-of-war for the soul of Bill Clinton."
</p>
<p> In public, Clinton was ambiguous, noting that while air strikes
might be used to protect peacekeepers, there should be some
"confusion" on the part of the Serbs about "what the nature
of our response would be." Some of this could be shadow play,
efforts to look tough and bluff the Serbs, since senior Administration
officials were advising privately, "Don't assume automatically
that we're going to war." If air attacks are mounted, an official
said, some bombs and missiles might find their way to targets
like supply dumps. But with only 80 U.N. attack planes in the
region, no one suggested they were thinking about clearing Serbian
artillery off the hills around Sarajevo.
</p>
<p> In London a Foreign Office spokesman indicated Britain was still
not convinced air attacks made sense. "Our objection," he said,
"has always been, Air strikes to achieve what?" However eager
to attack he might be in his heart, Clinton remains committed
to the proposition that military action will be taken only in
concert with the allies. So the answer to the British question
is likely to be, Air strikes only if U.N. peacekeepers come
under heavy attack. Knowing those rules, how likely are the
Serbs to provide a provocation? Military intervention from the
West, the deus ex machina the Muslims have been hoping for,
still looks unlikely. If the war in Bosnia is going to end at
last, it is up to the bloodstained Bosnians to end it themselves.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>